Blog

February 20
Discover essential strategies for corporate governance compliance and effective legal navigation. Read the article to enhance your governance approach.
February 20
Discover essential insights on choosing a top fund formation attorney for your investment needs. Read now for expert guidance and make informed decisions.
January 28
Discover how a top SBA acquisition lawyer can guide your small business to success. Learn essential strategies and insights for effective growth. Read more!
January 28
Explore how top life sciences law firms address legal challenges in healthcare. Gain insights for navigating complex regulations effectively. Read more.
January 28
Discover how top fintech regulatory lawyers tackle today's compliance challenges. Read to gain insights and strategies for navigating the complex landscape.
January 22
Discover how an expert startup fundraising lawyer can guide you through legal challenges and funding strategies. Read the article for essential insights.
January 10
Regulation A is often described as a “mini-IPO”—a way for private companies to raise capital from the public without fully registering under the Securities Act. In theory, it offers a compelling middle ground: broader investor access than a private placement, with fewer burdens than a traditional IPO. In practice, Regulation A plays a very small role in U.S. capital formation, particularly when compared to Regulation D. Understanding why requires looking at both the structure of Regulation A and the actual
January 10
For most U.S. startups and growth-stage companies, Regulation D remains the default mechanism for raising private capital. It is fast, familiar, and efficient, particularly where accredited investors are available. Regulation Crowdfunding (“Reg CF”), by contrast, was designed to democratize access to capital by allowing companies to raise money from non-accredited investors through SEC-registered online platforms. While Reg CF has expanded who can participate in private markets, the data shows it continues to represent a very small share of overall capital
January 10
Simple Agreements for Future Equity (“SAFEs”) have become the dominant early-stage financing instrument for startups. They are quick to implement, founder-friendly, and avoid early valuation negotiations. Despite their ubiquity, SAFEs raise a persistent and unresolved tax question: Do SAFEs constitute “equity” for Qualified Small Business Stock (“QSBS”) purposes before they convert into stock?